

Our redaction software powered by AI allows you to perform redaction manually and automatically.From transcription, translation, storage to maintenance of chain of custody, separate portals and access restrictions, and even redaction – we got it all! Our Digital Evidence Management System (DEMS) is the ultimate solution for handling all your digital evidence needs. Recognized and mentioned in the IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Digital Evidence Management Solutions for Law Enforcement 2020 Vendor Assessment report, VIDIZMO is the provider of video management systems for enterprises and law enforcement organizations. There is a long history of failed redactions and the aftermath of their presentation. If redaction, where needed in digital evidence files, is absent or not done correctly, the court can press serious penalties in the form of cost consequences. Read More: GDPR Redaction Rules No Redaction – Serious Penalties GDPR, HIPAA, CJIS, FEDRAMP, CCPA, GLBA, California State Bill 748 (SB-748) and others impose compliance requirements regarding digital evidence data, which include the implementation of redaction, to protect PII data and the privacy and anonymity of citizens, such as minors and bystanders. However, the CRoC are not the only ones imposing the requirement to perform redaction on digital evidence.
CALIFORNIA LAW REGARDING REDACTED EMAIL UPDATE
Redaction Is A Necessity – Compliance RequirementsĪs of 2016, California Rules of Court added their update clause regarding redaction for the security of PII information. In a publication, the business law firm Buchalter specified that critical data is always at risk of being targeted by information “vultures” - people such as identity thieves, web marketers, and individuals of similar interests who wish to capitalize on the critical information of participants in a lawsuit.įor this reason and several others, the court of California in particular, and Federal courts in general have made notable changes to their rules of filing and emphasized implementing redaction to protect PII information of involved individuals from uncontrolled public distribution. This is due to the reason that in the digital age, this critical data can be used to impersonate individuals.Īccording to a survey in April 2019, 72% of 1,002 internet users showed their biggest concern to be identity theft and fraud. There are elements that fall into the category of PII that users are often concerned about when distributing across the internet. The privacy of personal user data has been a constantly rising and ongoing concern in this rapidly digitizing world. Privacy Is One Of The Biggest Concerns Of The World This blog will further explore the matters surrounding redaction, in light of what is specified in California Redaction Rules, and end with our proposed solution for the redaction of digital evidence.

Several compliance requirements also demand for video, audio, document and image redaction for the presentation and distribution of evidence files in any public setting, such as mainstream media, or the court.Ĭalifornia Redaction Rules, as specified in Rule 8.83 Section (d) Clause 2 and Rule 1.201 Section (a) of the 2022 California Rules of Court, strictly indicate that redaction may be performed on all evidence that contains any form of PII (Personally Identifiable Information) before presentation to the court, except in certain specified circumstances.

In modern-day law enforcement, with the huge influx of digital evidence and data flowing around back and forth from countless ingestion points and organizations, redaction has become a necessity – something no law enforcer can deny.
